Student Learning - Learning Organizations

Parallels Between Paradigms

 Will Barratt, Ph.D.

Department of Counseling
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, IN 47809

ACPA '98

 Gateway to Learning: Promoting Student Success

Monday, March 16
9:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m.
Adams Mark, Room 24

 

Learning and Action

Learning and action are only tentatively connected.

Do you apply all that you know every day in your work?

Attitude and behavior are only tentatively connected.

Is what you believe and what you always in harmony?

The correspondence between knowledge and action, between attitude and behavior, are the essential characteristics of student learning and learning organizations.

 

Who or what learns?

People learn in organizations.

Formal organizations are abstract fictions co-evolved by people with some common purpose. Organizations are not real, but are useful ideas in describing the way that people organize.

People learning, and acting on that learning, affects organizational structures and processes.

Interpersonal processes in organizations, and organizational structures are dynamic, adapting to changing conditions. When the people change, the organization changes.

If and only if structure and process change do you get organizational change. The learning organization is a changing organization. The learning student is a changing student.

What is
Student Learning?
What are
Learning Organizations?

Learning is the act or process of acquiring knowledge or skill, the modification of behavior through practice, training or experience.

The Random House Dictionary of the English Language

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Learning is the act or experience of one that learns, knowledge or skill acquired by instruction or study, modification of a behavioral tendency by experience (as exposure to conditioning)

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hallmarks of a college educated person include:

  • (a) complex cognitive skills such as reflection and critical thinking;
  • (b) an ability to apply knowledge to practical problems encountered in one's vocation, family, or other areas of life;
  • (c) an understanding and appreciation of human differences;
  • (d) practical competence skills (e.g., decision making, conflict resolution); and
  • (e) a coherent integrated sense of identify, self-esteem, confidence, integrity, aesthetic sensibilities, and civic responsibility.

The concepts of "learning," "personal development," and "student development" are inextricably intertwined and inseparable.

Student Learning Imperative - ACPA

This, then, is the basic meaning of a 'learning organization' - an organization that is continually expanding its capacity to create its future. For such an organization, it is not enough merely to survive. 'Survival learning' or what is more often termed 'adaptive learning' is important - indeed it is necessary. But for a learning organization, 'adaptive learning' must be joined by 'generative learning,' learning that enhances our capacity to create. (p. 14)

Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Learning organizations are guided by a shared vision that focuses the energies of organizational members on creating superior value for customers. These organizations continuously acquire, process, and disseminate throughout the organization knowledge about markets, products, technology, and business processes. They do not hesitate to question long held assumptions and beliefs regarding their business. Their knowledge is based on experience, experimentation, and information from customers, suppliers, competitors, and other sources. Through complex communication, coordination, and conflict resolution processes, these organizations reach a shared interpretation of the information, which enables them to act swiftly and decisively to exploit opportunities and defuse problems. Learning organizations are exceptional in their ability to anticipate and act on opportunities in turbulent and fragmenting markets.

Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59, 63-74.

 

These companies place emphasis on generative learning, called 'double-loop learning' by Chris Argyris. Generative learning emphasizes continuous experimentation and feedback in an ongoing examination of the very way organizations go about defining problems. . . By contrast, adaptive or single-loop learning focuses on solving problems in the present without examining the appropriateness of current learning behaviors.

A learning organization has a culture and value set that promotes learning. A learning culture is characterized by its clear and consistent (1) openness to experience; (2) encouragement of responsible risk taking; and (3) willingness to acknowledge failures and learn from them.. (p. 76)

McGill, M.E. & Slocum, J.W. (1993). Unlearning the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67-79.

 

"A learning organization is an organization that institutes OLMs and operates them regularly. . . . OLMs' are organizational learning mechanisms, which are defined as institutionalized structural and procedural arrangements that allow organizations to systematically collect, analyze, store, disseminate, and use information that is relevant to the effectiveness of the organization.

Lipshitz, R., Popper, M. & Oz, S. (1996). Building learning organizations: The design and implementation of organizational learning mechanisms. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(3), 292-305.

 

Three frames, paradigms or images of learning organizations:

Normative - Learning organizations must be like this . . .

Developmental - Learning organizations are the acme of organizational development.

Capacity Building - By enhancing the learning already inherent in the system, organizations enhance their capacity as learning organizations.

 

Scientific Learning
Logical positivism, modern epistemology, emphasis on observable and repeatable data.
Exemplified by Reflective Judgement (King and Kitchener).

Student Learning:

Learning Organizations:

Quantitative and qualitative research and evaluation, exemplified in physics, chemistry, anthropology, and presented in data based articles.

Quantitative and qualitative research and evaluation, exemplified in Student

Affairs Research Office reports, student evaluations of teaching and student affairs programs, market analysis and demographic studies.

 

Intentional Learning
Structured Inquiry, Method Based Inquiry
Exemplified by pedagogy models.

Student Learning:

Learning Organizations:

Piano lessons, school and self-help classes, self paced lessons in workbooks.

TQM, CQI, QE, and Quality Circle programs, Institutional Research Offices, staff development programs.

 

Skill Learning

Student Learning: Learning Organizations:
Touch typing, basketball

Customer interactions, work process re-engineering,

 

Post-Modern Learning
Politics and The Personal as interpreters of experience.

Student Learning:

Learning Organizations:

Politically mediated interpretations of events, politics as the primary interpretative method used to make meaning of experience.

Organizationally influential leaders use politically mediated interpretations of events to make meaning of experiences and to learn about the organization.

 

Belief Learning
Rumor, Gossip, Unstructured Inquiry
Best exemplified by Religion and Values and Gossip

Student Learning:

Learning Organizations:

Reliance on social interaction for learning. Meeting with the coffee club.

Reliance on social interaction for learning. Meeting with pre-selected student leaders

 

Vicarious Learning
Learning from others’ experiences rather than from direct experience.
Best exemplified by Bandura’s Social Learning Theory

Student Learning:

Learning Organizations:

Observation, audio and video tape, lectures, peer group learning.

Bench marking, best practices models, observing the competition.

 

Mapping from Student Learning to Learning Organizations

 

Student Development Examples

Organization Process and
Structure Examples

Post-Formal Operations, complex constructed knowledge in a social context. (Laboivie-Vief)

Probabilistic Thinking

(King and Kitchener)

Post Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg)

Participatory Management Group Collaboration

Lead Management (Glasser)

Goal based management

Principled management

Laisez Faire management

Delegation

Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg)

Mixed models of directing and delegating.

Rule and social system based management.

Received Absolute Knowledge (Baxter-Magolda)

Dualistic Thinking (Perry, King and Kitchener)

Pre Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg)

Directive 'telling' management Directed learning

Limited individual autonomy

Authority based learning

Boss Management (Glasser)

Operations Manual based management

Rule based management

 

Organizational Processes and Structures

 

People

Org. Structures

Things

Outside
Influences

People P x P      
Org. Structures

P x OS

OS x OS

   
Things

P x T

OS x T

T x T

 
Outside
Influences

P x OI

OS x OI

T x OI

OI x OI

 

Organizational Processes and Structures

PxP What are the interpersonal processes in the organization?
How do the interpersonal processes in the various sub-units interact?

PxOS How do interpersonal processes and the organization’s structures interact?
How is this different in different sub-units?
How do the organization’s rules and procedures affect individual performance?

OSxOS Are there conflicts within the organization’s rules and procedures?

PxT How does the physical layout of the organization affect interpersonal processes?

OSxT How does the physical layout of the organization affect the organization’s rules, procedures and structure?

PxOI What impact does the economy have on the people in the organization?

What type of organization learning processes and structures does each MBTI ® type produce?
Introversion

 

Extroversion

Sensing

 

Intuition

Thinking

 

Feeling

Perceiving

 

Judging

NF - Student Affairs Type

 

 

 

What type of organization learning processes and structures does each Holland type produce?
Realistic

 

Investigative

 

Artistic

 

Social

 

Enterprising

 

Conventional

 

SEA - Student Affairs Type

 

 


Is student affairs on my campus a learning organization?

Is student affairs on my campus committed to the continuous enhancement of staffs’ knowledge and skills and to its own collective improvement?

(Is staff development 2.5% of the salary budget?)

Does student affairs on my campus have institutionalized structural and procedural arrangements that systematically collect, analyze, store, disseminate, and use information that is relevant to its effectiveness?

(Does anyone really get any quality information and act on it?)

Is student affairs on my campus guided by a shared vision that focuses their energies on creating quality experiences for students?

(Can all staff quote the student affairs division mission statement?)

Is student affairs on my campus open to new experiences and to questioning long held assumptions and beliefs regarding student affairs on my campus?

(Is it business as usual, or does it ever try anything really new?)

Does student affairs on my campus emphasize 'double-loop learning' that gets at the root causes of problems?

(Does it only solve the problem at hand, or does it look for the real source of problems?)

Does student affairs on my campus emphasize continuous experimentation and feedback in an ongoing examination of the very way we define problems?

(Does it really try new things, or only improve on old ways of doing things?)

Does student affairs on my campus encourage responsible risk taking?

(Does fear of failure prevent innovation and risk?)

Is student affairs on my campus willing to acknowledge failures and learn from them?

(Does failure mean a search for blame, or an opportunity to refine programs?)

 


Learning Organization - Semantic Differential

 

Control

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Autonomy

Hierarchy

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Heterarchy

Centralized

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Distributed

Active

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Passive

Powerless

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Powerful

Outward Looking

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Inward Looking

Intuitive

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Grounded

Thinking

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Feeling

Judgmental

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Non-Judgmental

People

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Things

Data

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Ideas

Realistic

1

2

3

4

5

5

6

Social

Investigative

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Enterprising

Conventional

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Artistic

Open

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Closed

Information

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Opinion

Data Driven

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Tradition Driven

Created 3/98 using FrontPage Express to format material imported from MS Word '97 and WordPerfect 8.

Copyright, Will Barratt, 1998. This material may not be reproduced without permission.

Student Affairs and Higher Education Graduate Program

University Learning Outcomes Assessment