Student Learning - Learning Organizations Parallels Between Paradigms Department of
Counseling Gateway to Learning: Promoting Student Success Monday, March 16 |
Learning and Action |
Learning and action are only tentatively
connected.
Attitude and behavior are only tentatively connected.
The correspondence between knowledge and action, between attitude and behavior, are the essential characteristics of student learning and learning organizations. |
Who or what learns? |
| People learn in organizations. Formal organizations are abstract fictions co-evolved by people with some common purpose. Organizations are not real, but are useful ideas in describing the way that people organize. People learning, and acting on that learning, affects organizational structures and processes. Interpersonal processes in organizations, and organizational structures are dynamic, adapting to changing conditions. When the people change, the organization changes. If and only if structure and process change do you get organizational change. The learning organization is a changing organization. The learning student is a changing student. |
| What is
Student Learning? |
What are Learning Organizations? |
Learning is the act or process of acquiring knowledge or skill, the modification of behavior through practice, training or experience. The Random House Dictionary of the English Language +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Learning is the act or experience of one that learns, knowledge or skill acquired by instruction or study, modification of a behavioral tendency by experience (as exposure to conditioning) Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Hallmarks of a college educated person include:
The concepts of "learning," "personal development," and "student development" are inextricably intertwined and inseparable. Student Learning Imperative - ACPA |
This, then, is the basic
meaning of a 'learning organization' - an organization
that is continually expanding its capacity to create its
future. For such an organization, it is not enough merely
to survive. 'Survival learning' or what is more often
termed 'adaptive learning' is important - indeed it is
necessary. But for a learning organization, 'adaptive
learning' must be joined by 'generative learning,'
learning that enhances our capacity to create. (p. 14) Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday. Learning organizations are guided by a shared vision that focuses the energies of organizational members on creating superior value for customers. These organizations continuously acquire, process, and disseminate throughout the organization knowledge about markets, products, technology, and business processes. They do not hesitate to question long held assumptions and beliefs regarding their business. Their knowledge is based on experience, experimentation, and information from customers, suppliers, competitors, and other sources. Through complex communication, coordination, and conflict resolution processes, these organizations reach a shared interpretation of the information, which enables them to act swiftly and decisively to exploit opportunities and defuse problems. Learning organizations are exceptional in their ability to anticipate and act on opportunities in turbulent and fragmenting markets. Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59, 63-74.
These companies place emphasis on generative learning, called 'double-loop learning' by Chris Argyris. Generative learning emphasizes continuous experimentation and feedback in an ongoing examination of the very way organizations go about defining problems. . . By contrast, adaptive or single-loop learning focuses on solving problems in the present without examining the appropriateness of current learning behaviors. A learning organization has a culture and value set that promotes learning. A learning culture is characterized by its clear and consistent (1) openness to experience; (2) encouragement of responsible risk taking; and (3) willingness to acknowledge failures and learn from them.. (p. 76) McGill, M.E. & Slocum, J.W. (1993). Unlearning the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67-79.
"A learning organization is an organization that institutes OLMs and operates them regularly. . . . OLMs' are organizational learning mechanisms, which are defined as institutionalized structural and procedural arrangements that allow organizations to systematically collect, analyze, store, disseminate, and use information that is relevant to the effectiveness of the organization. Lipshitz, R., Popper, M. & Oz, S. (1996). Building learning organizations: The design and implementation of organizational learning mechanisms. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(3), 292-305. |
Three frames, paradigms or images of learning organizations: |
|
Scientific Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Quantitative and qualitative research and evaluation, exemplified in physics, chemistry, anthropology, and presented in data based articles. | Quantitative and qualitative research and evaluation, exemplified in Student Affairs Research Office reports, student evaluations of teaching and student affairs programs, market analysis and demographic studies. |
Intentional Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Piano lessons, school and self-help classes, self paced lessons in workbooks. | TQM, CQI, QE, and Quality Circle programs, Institutional Research Offices, staff development programs. |
Skill Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Touch typing, basketball | Customer interactions, work process re-engineering, |
Post-Modern Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Politically mediated interpretations of events, politics as the primary interpretative method used to make meaning of experience. | Organizationally influential leaders use politically mediated interpretations of events to make meaning of experiences and to learn about the organization. |
Belief Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Reliance on social interaction for learning. Meeting with the coffee club. | Reliance on social interaction for learning. Meeting with pre-selected student leaders |
Vicarious Learning |
|
| Student Learning: | Learning Organizations: |
| Observation, audio and video tape, lectures, peer group learning. | Bench marking, best practices models, observing the competition. |
Mapping from Student Learning to Learning Organizations
| Student Development Examples | Organization Process and |
| Post-Formal Operations,
complex constructed knowledge in a social context.
(Laboivie-Vief) Probabilistic Thinking (King and Kitchener) Post Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg) |
Participatory Management Group Collaboration Lead Management (Glasser) Goal based management Principled management Laisez Faire management Delegation |
| Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg) | Mixed models of directing and delegating. Rule and social system based management. |
| Received
Absolute Knowledge (Baxter-Magolda) Dualistic Thinking (Perry, King and Kitchener) Pre Conventional Reasoning (Kohlberg) |
Directive 'telling' management Directed learning Limited individual autonomy Authority based learning Boss Management (Glasser) Operations Manual based management Rule based management |
Organizational Processes and Structures
People |
Org. Structures |
Things |
Outside |
|
| People | P x P | |||
| Org. Structures | P x OS |
OS x OS |
||
| Things | P x T |
OS x T |
T x T |
|
| Outside Influences |
P x OI |
OS x OI |
T x OI |
OI x OI |
Organizational Processes and Structures
PxP What are the interpersonal processes in the organization?
How do the interpersonal processes in the various sub-units interact?
PxOS How do interpersonal processes and the organizations structures interact?
How is this different in different sub-units?
How do the organizations rules and procedures affect individual performance?
OSxOS Are there conflicts within the organizations rules and procedures?
PxT How does the physical layout of the organization affect interpersonal processes?
OSxT How does the physical layout of the organization affect the organizations rules, procedures and structure?
PxOI What impact does the economy have on the people in the organization?
| What type of organization learning processes and structures does each MBTI ® type produce? | |
| Introversion
|
Extroversion |
| Sensing
|
Intuition |
| Thinking
|
Feeling |
| Perceiving
|
Judging |
NF - Student Affairs Type
|
|
| What type of organization learning processes and structures does each Holland type produce? |
| Realistic
|
| Investigative
|
| Artistic
|
| Social
|
| Enterprising
|
| Conventional
|
SEA - Student Affairs Type
|
Is student affairs on my campus a learning organization?
Is student affairs on my campus committed to the continuous enhancement of staffs knowledge and skills and to its own collective improvement?
(Is staff development 2.5% of the salary budget?)
Does student affairs on my campus have institutionalized structural and procedural arrangements that systematically collect, analyze, store, disseminate, and use information that is relevant to its effectiveness?
(Does anyone really get any quality information and act on it?)
Is student affairs on my campus guided by a shared vision that focuses their energies on creating quality experiences for students?
(Can all staff quote the student affairs division mission statement?)
Is student affairs on my campus open to new experiences and to questioning long held assumptions and beliefs regarding student affairs on my campus?
(Is it business as usual, or does it ever try anything really new?)
Does student affairs on my campus emphasize 'double-loop learning' that gets at the root causes of problems?
(Does it only solve the problem at hand, or does it look for the real source of problems?)
Does student affairs on my campus emphasize continuous experimentation and feedback in an ongoing examination of the very way we define problems?
(Does it really try new things, or only improve on old ways of doing things?)
Does student affairs on my campus encourage responsible risk taking?
(Does fear of failure prevent innovation and risk?)
Is student affairs on my campus willing to acknowledge failures and learn from them?
(Does failure mean a search for blame, or an opportunity to refine programs?)
Learning Organization - Semantic Differential
| Control | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Autonomy |
| Hierarchy | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Heterarchy |
| Centralized | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Distributed |
| Active | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Passive |
| Powerless | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Powerful |
| Outward Looking | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Inward Looking |
| Intuitive | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Grounded |
| Thinking | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Feeling |
| Judgmental | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Non-Judgmental |
| People | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Things |
| Data | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Ideas |
| Realistic | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
Social |
| Investigative | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Enterprising |
| Conventional | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Artistic |
| Open | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Closed |
| Information | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Opinion |
| Data Driven | 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Tradition Driven |
Created 3/98 using FrontPage Express to format material imported from MS Word '97 and WordPerfect 8.
Copyright, Will Barratt, 1998. This material may not be reproduced without permission.
Student Affairs and Higher Education Graduate Program
University Learning Outcomes Assessment